International Informix Users Group

	Informix News

14 August 08 - IIUG.org - Sellout Expected for the 2009 IIUG Informix Conference... Read 29 April 08 - IntelligentEnterprise.com - IBM Informix Upgrade Enhances Clustering, Database Management... Read 29 April 08 - itweek.com - IBM 'Cheetah 2' mauls data costs... Read 28 April 08 - eWeek.com - IBM Uncages Cheetah 2 Data Server... Read 28 April 08 - CNNMoney.com - IBM Helps Clients Reduce Data Management Costs With New Informix Dynamic Server... Read 09 April 08 - CNNMoney.com - MediaSpan Embeds IBM Informix Dynamic Server Software for Delivering News to Print, Web and Wireless Devices... Read 08 April 08 - IT-Director.com - Informix seeks developers... Read 18 February 08 - marketwire.com - Icarus Studios Partners With IBM to Upgrade Performance, Availability for Its Online Games... Read 17 January 08 - eWeek.com - IBM Adds Mac Support to IDS for Higher Education... Read 17 January 08 - informationweek.com - Lotus Notes For iPhone Signals Closer Ties Between IBM, Apple... Read 16 January 08 - marketwire.com - IBM Informix Dynamic Server to Deliver Support for Mac OS X... Read 16 January 08 - internetnews.com - IBM's IDS to Support Mac Platform... Read 28 June 07 - REG Developer - IBM and Informix tie down Cheetah... Read 27 June 07 - CBRonline.com - IBM corrects its own Informix customer figures... Read 14 June 07 - vnunet.com - IBM changes spots with Informix 'Cheetah' database... Read 14 June 07 - eChannelLine - IBM expands scope for IDS... Read 14 June 07 - Resellernews - IBM: Informix database alive and kicking... Read 13 June 07 - DB2 Magazine - Cheetah is now out of the gate... Read 12 June 07 - IBM - IDS 11 release announcement (pdf)... Read 12 June 07 - ChannelWeb Network - IBM Uncages IDS 11, Aka Cheetah, Database... Read 12 June 07 - eWeek.com - IBM's 'Cheetah' Ready to Pounce... Read 12 June 07 - InformationWeek - IBM Unleashes 'Cheetah' Database... Read 12 June 07 - WebWire - IBM Strengthens Database Portfolio With New Informix Dynamic Server... Read 12 June 07 - Intelligent Enterprise - IBM Unveils Informix Upgrade... Read 12 June 07 - ComputerWeekly.com - IBM's Cheetah IDS makes leap to better data centre clustering... Read 12 June 07 - ebiz - IBM Unveils Next Generation Informix Dynamic Server... Read 12 June 07 - computerworld.com - Will 'Cheetah' help IBM's Informix chase down market share?... Read 12 June 07 - Internetnews.com - No Data Can Outrun This 'Cheetah'... Read 12 June 07 - de.internet.com - IBM neuer Datenbank-Server mit Codenamen Cheetah ist fertig... Read 12 June 07 - verifox.de - IBM stärkt Datenbank-Portfolio mit neuem Informix Dynamic Server... Read 12 June 07 - golem.de - Informix 11 vorgestellt... Read 12 June 07 - Computerwoche.de - IBM stellt neue Informix-Version vor... Read 12 June 07 - IBM.de - IBM stärkt Datenbank-Portfolio mit neuem Informix Dynamic Server... Read 12 June 07 - Heise - IBM gibt Informix 11 frei... Read 25 May 07 - Taiwan.CNET.com - Local Taiwan Informix user group established... (Chinese language) ... Read 18 May 07 - ChannelWeb Network - IBM Musters Partners For Cheetah Release... Read 18 May 07 - eWeek.com - IBM Looks to 'Cheetah' to Speed Up Blade Servers... Read 7 May 07 - DB2 Magazine - SQL Shortcuts - Use these tricks to generate IDS SQL scripts... Read Previous news items

Home Member Area About IIUG

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum

RE: Ontape - Onbar - Ontape

Posted By: Butler, Debbie
Date: Friday, 17 January 2003, at 3:51 p.m.

In Response To: Ontape - Onbar - Ontape (Emilio Alejandro Garza Reyes)

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C2BE69.1777FEFE
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"

You are correct in that you do not want to mix ontape and onbar.

You can edit the log_full.sh and comment out the onbar line or have it kick off an ontape -a or point to no_log.sh. However we use log_full at our site to trap and check for other event alarms so you want to carry over any logic you have there.

As to your Legato issue the secondary machine must match the configuration of the first machine and you need to tell Legato that you want to restore the backup taken from the primary machine. I think the correct env variable to user there is NSR_CLIENT. The client name is connected to the backup restore request.

Hope this helps

Debbie

-----Original Message-----
From: Emilio Alej.... [mailto:egarza@citi.com.mx]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 2:09 PM
To: ids@iiug.org
Subject: Ontape - Onbar - Ontape [33]

Hi Guys,

I've been working with this problem since 1 week ago, we have a Storage
Manager
that was Set up last month, before this we used ontape to make full backups
and for logical logs, the software(Legato) was configured on the server and
then
we migrate from ontape to Onbar .. everything worked fine until we need to
restore a onbar a full backup on another server, the onbar utility could not
read
the tape and then we switch to ontape again to restore on that server, the
software
vendor is working on finding what went wrong with onbar ..

but that's not the problem
that i'm having, when we configure again ontape on the server, we made a
rollback of
every change... BUT the onbar utility still working on the machine trying to
make backups
of the logical logs, we need to kill the onbar_d process and then launch a
ontape -c for
continous backups, i find out that the ALARMPROGRAM variable is the one that
detects
a log full and then starts the onbar -d -l to backup the logical log, do I
need to
the change that variable to no_log.sh ??????

Before we migrate from ontape to onbar the ALARMPROGRAM was set with
log_full.sh, so
we didn't make any change on that ...

------_=_NextPart_001_01C2BE69.1777FEFE
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2655.35">
<TITLE>RE: Ontape - Onbar - Ontape [33] </TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

You are correct in that you do not want to mix ontape =
and onbar.


You can edit the log_full.sh and comment out the =
onbar line or have it kick off an ontape -a or point to =
no_log.sh.  However we use log_full at our site to trap and check =
for other event alarms so you want to carry over any logic you have =
there.

As to your Legato issue the secondary machine must =
match the configuration of the first machine and you need to tell =
Legato that you want to restore the backup taken from the primary =
machine.  I think the correct env variable to user there is =
NSR_CLIENT.  The client name is connected to the backup restore =
request.

Hope this helps


Debbie 


-----Original Message-----
 From: Emilio Alej.... [<A =
HREF=3D"mailto:egarza@citi.com.mx">mailto:egarza@citi.com.mx</A>]=

 Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 2:09 PM
 To: ids@iiug.org
 Subject: Ontape - Onbar - Ontape [33] 

 
 

Hi Guys,


I've been working with this problem since 1 week ago, =
we have a Storage
 Manager
 that was Set up last month, before this we used =
ontape to make full backups
 and for logical logs, the software(Legato) was =
configured on the server and
 then
 we migrate from ontape to Onbar .. everything worked =
fine until we need to
 restore a onbar a full backup on another server, the =
onbar utility could not
 read
 the tape and then we switch to ontape again to =
restore on that server, the
 software
 vendor is working on finding what went wrong with =
onbar ..

 

but that's not the problem
 that i'm having, when we configure again ontape on =
the server, we made a
 rollback of
 every change... BUT the onbar utility still working =
on the machine trying to
 make backups
 of the logical logs, we need to kill the onbar_d =
process and then launch a
 ontape -c for
 continous backups, i find out that the ALARMPROGRAM =
variable is the one that
 detects
 a log full and then starts the onbar -d -l to backup =
the logical log, do I
 need to
 the change that variable to no_log.sh ??????


Before we migrate from ontape to onbar the =
ALARMPROGRAM was set with
 log_full.sh, so
 we didn't make any change on that ...


</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C2BE69.1777FEFE--

Messages In This Thread

Ontape - Onbar - Ontape
Emilio Alejandro Garza Reyes -- Friday, 17 January 2003, at 2:09 p.m.
- RE: Ontape - Onbar - Ontape
  Butler, Debbie -- Friday, 17 January 2003, at 3:51 p.m.

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 5.12.