Save 
Join IIUG
 for   
 

Informix News
13 Jan 12 - MC Press online - Informix Dynamic Server Entices New Users with Free Production Edition ... Read
11 Jan 12 - Computerworld - Ecologic Analytics and Landis+Gyr -- Suitors Decide to Tie the Knot... Read
9 Jan 12 - planetIDS.com - DNS impact on Informix / Impacto do DNS no Informix... Read
8 Sep 11 - TMCnet.com - IBM Offers Database Solution to Enable Smart Meter Data Capture... Read
1 Aug 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Happy 10th anniversary to IBM and Informix... Read
8 Jul 11 - Database Trends and Applications - Managing Time Series Data with Informix... Read
31 May 11 - Smart Grid - The meter data management pitfall utilities are overlooking... Read
27 May 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Big data, big time ( Series data, warehouse acceleration, and 4GLs )... Read
16 May 11 - Business Wire - HiT Software Announces DBMoto for Enterprise Integration, Adds Informix. Log-based Change Data Capture... Read
21 Mar 11 - Yahoo! Finance - IBM and Cable&Wireless Worldwide Announce UK Smart Energy Cloud... Read
14 Mar 11 - MarketWatch - Fuzzy Logix and IBM Unveil In-Database Analytics for IBM Informix... Read
11 Mar 11 - InvestorPlace - It's Time to Give IBM Props: How many tech stocks are up 53% since the dot-com boom?... Read
9 Mar 11 - DBTA - Database Administration and the Goal of Diminishing Downtime... Read
2 Feb 11 - DBTAs - Informix 11.7 Flexible Grid Provides a Different Way of Looking at Database Servers... Read
27 Jan 11 - exactsolutions - Exact to Add Informix Support to Database Replay, SQL Monitoring Solutions... Read
25 Jan 11 - PR Newswire - Bank of China in the UK Works With IBM to Become a Smarter, Greener Bank... Read
12 Oct 10 - Database Trends and Applications - Informix 11.7: The Beginning of the Next Decade of IBM Informix... Read
20 Sep 10 - planetIDS.com - ITG analyst paper: Cost/Benefit case for IBM Informix as compared to Microsoft SQL Server... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - IBM Informix Choice Edition V11.50 helps deploy low-cost scalable and reliable solutions for Apple Macintosh and Microsoft Windows... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - Software withdrawal: Elite Support for Informix Ultimate-C Edition... Read
24 May 10 - eWeek Europe - IBM Supplies Database Tech For EU Smart Grid... Read
23 May 10 - SiliconIndia - IBM's smart metering system allows wise use of energy... Read
21 May 10 - CNET - IBM to help people monitor energy use... Read
20 May 10 - ebiz - IBM Teams With Hildebrand To Bring Smart Metering To Homes Across Britain... Read
19 May 10 - The New Blog Times - Misurare il consumo energetico: DEHEMS è pronto... Read
19 May 10 - ZDNet - IBM software in your home? Pact enables five-city smart meter pilot in Europe... Read
17 March 10 - ZDNet (blog) David Morgenstern - TCO: New research finds Macs in the enterprise easier, cheaper to manage than... Read
17 March 2010 - Virtualization Review - ...key components of Big Blue's platform to the commercial cloud such as its WebSphere suite of application ser vers and its DB2 and Informix databases... Read
10 February 2010 - The Wall Street Journal - International Business Machines is expanding an initiative to win over students and professors on its products. How do they lure the college crowd?... Read


End of Support Dates

IIUG on Facebook IIUG on Twitter


[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

Development Tools Forum

Re: How to use construct statement with formon....

Posted By: Mike Aubury
Date: Monday, 21 June 2010, at 9:52 a.m.

In Response To: Re: How to use construct statement with formonly f (Art Kagel)

I dont think theres any problem using FORMONLY fields in a CONSTRUCT - as the
table/columns can be specified separately from the fields (unless you're doing
a BY NAME).

Now - how much use that is - I dont know :-)
It really depends on what you want to use those fields for as part of the
CONSTRUCT.

FWIW - Aubit4GL has a "filter callback" you can use with a CONSTRUCT to
'adjust' whats actually put into the generated string :

....
CONSTRUCT lv_str ON a,b FROM a,b VIA c_callback
...

function c_callback(lv_tabname, lv_colname, lv_string,lv_dtype,
lv_dtypelength)
define lv_tabname char(18)
define lv_colname char(18)
define lv_string char(300)
define lv_dtype,lv_dtypelength integer

# you return with no values - the construct will complain with
# an error in field...
if lv_colname="a" and lv_string="456" then

return
end if

# Normally - we'd want to generate the construct portion -
# but with maybe different column names
# In this callback we want to map 'a' to be 'blah'...
#
if lv_colname="a" then

# aclfgl_get_construct_element takes 5 parameters

# tablename, column name, search string,

# datatype and datatype length(eg for decimal or character length)

let lv_string=aclfgl_get_construct_element(lv_tabname ,

"blah", lv_string , lv_dtype, lv_dtypelength)
else

let lv_string=aclfgl_get_construct_element(lv_tabname ,

lv_colname , lv_string , lv_dtype, lv_dtypelength)
end if

return lv_string

end function

You can therefore have fields in the CONSTRUCT which are never passed into the
generate string, but that you still have "seen" (maybe storing them in some
module level variables for example)...

On Monday 21 June 2010 14:19:54 Art Kagel wrote:
> I actually don't remember if CONSTRUCT will work pointed at a FORMONLY
> field, but even if it does, I don't think that the WHERE clause filters
> built for them would be useful. Do the FORMONLY field names correspond to
> database table columns? Are the datatypes the same or compatible with the
> table columns you would filter against? I would think that the constructed
> filter would name the columns as "formonly.fieldname" which would not
> correspond to real columns in any query anyway.
>
> I would just use INPUT and build the filters myself. Note that even for
> integer fields the formonly "construct" fields will have to be CHAR type
> unless you only permit the entry of discrete numeric values. In order to
> permit the user to enter lists, ranges, inequalities, or wildcards you will
> have to make the formonly fields CHAR type. You may also have to parse the
> input to determine if you are generating an equality, inequality, IN()
> clause, LIKE clause, or MATCHES clause.
>
> Art
>
> Art S. Kagel
> Advanced DataTools (www.advancedatatools.com)
> IIUG Board of Directors (art@iiug.org)
>
> Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own opinions
> and do not reflect on my employer, Advanced DataTools, the IIUG, nor any
> other organization with which I am associated either explicitly,
> implicitly, or by inference. Neither do those opinions reflect those of
> other individuals affiliated with any entity with which I am affiliated
> nor those of the entities themselves.
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:14 AM, K CHANDRA <chandra.kala00@gmail.com> wrote:
> > We have a construct statement on several fields in a table. We want to
> > add more fields that are formonly. If there a way to use the construct
> > statement
> > with few formonly fields along with table fields or do we have go for
> > input statement?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Chandra.K
>
> ***************************************************************************
> ****
>
> > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>
> --000e0cd70dc2b3957604898a28b4
>
>
> ***************************************************************************
> **** Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.

--
Mike Aubury

http://www.aubit.com/
Aubit Computing Ltd is registered in England and Wales, Number: 3112827
Registered Address : Clayton House,59 Piccadilly,Manchester,M1 2AQ

Messages In This Thread

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

Development Tools Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 5.12.